File Decompression & Decryption:

The two RAR archives created during the compression and encryption tests were then decompressed and decrypted.

Large File Decompression & Decryption

WinRAR 3.71, Multithreaded, 276MB source file

  • Asus Striker II Formula
  • Asus Striker Extreme
  • XFX nForce 780i SLI
  • Inno3D nForce 680i SLI
  • 18.3
  • 17.7
  • 18.7
  • 39.7
0
10
20
30
40
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

Small File Decompression & Decryption

WinRAR 3.71, Multithreaded, 400 2048x1536 Photos

  • Asus Striker II Formula
  • Asus Striker Extreme
  • XFX nForce 780i SLI
  • Inno3D nForce 680i SLI
  • 25.3
  • 26.0
  • 26.7
  • 34.3
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

On average the decompression numbers for the Strikers are the same – a little faster with small files, a little slower with a single large file. Both are still slightly faster than the XFX nForce 780i SLI and consistently a lot faster than the Inno3D nForce 680i SLI.

Xvid Encoding:

We tested video encoding performance using VirtualDub-MPEG version 1.6.15 and a multithreaded version of the Xvid codec, along with the LAME MT MP3 encoder for encoding audio. We did a two-pass encode of a 15-minute 276MB digital TV recording with a target file size of 100MB.

Xvid Encoding

VirtualDub MPEG-2 1.6.15, Xvid 1.2 beta, 276MB .mpg to 100MB .avi

  • Asus Striker II Formula
  • Asus Striker Extreme
  • XFX nForce 780i SLI
  • Inno3D nForce 680i SLI
  • 749.0
  • 748.3
  • 732.5
  • 755.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

Again, the XFX nForce 780i SLI is slightly faster, even despite the "poorer" memory performance, and the difference between the Strikers is negligible at best. Again the Inno3D nForce 680i SLI is several seconds slower however.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04

TOP STORIES

SUGGESTED FOR YOU